lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ay2cwgycgjfqz5jmteeijgjiuje2u62wozhnkr76ag4tny6vl4@upbmy22y3hcn>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 00:46:39 +0800
From: "Wang, Qingshun" <qingshun.wang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, 
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com, erwin.tsaur@...el.com, 
	feiting.wanyan@...el.com, qingshun.wang@...el.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, 
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, 
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, 
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>, 
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, 
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, 
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>, Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>, 
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>, 
	Adam Preble <adam.c.preble@...el.com>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, 
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>, Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>, 
	Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI/AER: Handle Advisory Non-Fatal properly

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:26:16PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> In the subject, "properly" really doesn't convey information.  I think
> this patch does two things:
> 
>   - Prints error bits that might be ANFE 
>   - Clears UNCOR_STATUS bits that were previously not cleared
> 
> Maybe the subject line could say something about those (clearing
> UNCOR_STATUS might be more important, or maybe this could even be
> split into two patches so we could see both).
> 

Good idea, thanks. I think splitting it into two patches would be the
better approach.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ