[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACeCKad_ODKKa1QY2O=VOdYZ0MHOrLH5aOte_bPaY-10aRh1YA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:04:34 -0800
From: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@...omium.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
jthies@...gle.com, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Rajaram Regupathy <rajaram.regupathy@...el.com>,
Saranya Gopal <saranya.gopal@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] usb: typec: ucsi: Get PD revision for partner
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 2:18 AM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 02:05:38PM -0800, Abhishek Pandit-Subedi wrote:
> > Hi Heikki,
> >
> > Friendly ping to review this patch (I see you added Reviewed-by to the
> > other two in this series).
>
> I think Prashant said that he prefers macros with those version checks,
> and I kinda agree. But I'll leave this to you to decide. I think
> that's also something that can be improved later.
Yeah, the macro strikes me as unnecessary here. Anyhow, for the rest of it:
Reviewed-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists