linux-kernel - [patch 08/12] arm64 kernel/topology: use smp_call_function_single

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240206185710.037579553@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 15:49:19 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
 Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
 Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
 Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: [patch 08/12] arm64 kernel/topology: use smp_call_function_single_fail

Convert cpu_read_constcnt from smp_call_function_single
to smp_call_func_single_fail, which will fail in case
the target CPU is tagged as block interference CPU.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>

Index: linux-isolation/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
===================================================================
--- linux-isolation.orig/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ linux-isolation/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
 
 #include <asm/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
@@ -280,6 +281,8 @@ static void cpu_read_constcnt(void *val)
 static inline
 int counters_read_on_cpu(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, u64 *val)
 {
+	int ret, idx;
+
 	/*
 	 * Abort call on counterless CPU or when interrupts are
 	 * disabled - can lead to deadlock in smp sync call.
@@ -290,7 +293,11 @@ int counters_read_on_cpu(int cpu, smp_ca
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled()))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, val, 1);
+	idx = block_interf_srcu_read_lock();
+	ret = smp_call_function_single_fail(cpu, func, val, 1);
+	block_interf_srcu_read_unlock(idx);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	return 0;
 }