linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 12/12] nvmet-fc: use RCU list iterator for assoc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 11:22:49 -0800
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>, James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/12] nvmet-fc: use RCU list iterator for assoc_list

On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 02:51:24PM +0900, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 1/31/24 16:51, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > +		rcu_read_lock();
> > +		if (!nvmet_fc_assoc_exits(tgtport, ran)) {
> >   			assoc->association_id = ran;
> >   			list_add_tail_rcu(&assoc->a_list, &tgtport->assoc_list);
> > +			done = true;
> >   		}
> > +		rcu_read_unlock();
> >   		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tgtport->lock, flags);
> 
> Odd. You already take the tgtport lock, so there really is no point in using
> rcu_read_lock() here.

That's a interesting point, but I think it's harmless since there's no
rcu sync within the read section.

  https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html#Guaranteed%20Read-to-Write%20Upgrade

That said, the rcu_read_lock() seems like it should be moved to
nvmet_fc_assoc_exits() since that's the only part reading rcu protected
structures.