linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/14] perf annotate-data: Add stack canary type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:40:29 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, 
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, 
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] perf annotate-data: Add stack canary type

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:19 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 7:21 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 2:05 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > When the stack protector is enabled, compiler would generate code to
> > > check stack overflow with a special value called 'stack carary' at
> > > runtime.  On x86_64, GCC hard-codes the stack canary as %gs:40.
> > >
> > > While there's a definition of fixed_percpu_data in asm/processor.h,
> > > it seems that the header is not included everywhere and many places
> > > it cannot find the type info.  As it's in the well-known location (at
> > > %gs:40), let's add a pseudo stack canary type to handle it specially.
> >
> > I wonder if cases like this can be handled by debug info rather than
> > special cases in the tool. Special cases are fine too, but are
> > potentially less portable.
>
> Agreed, but I couldn't find anything special in DWARF.

The fs and gs selectors are commonly used for thread local storage, so
could something like DW_OP_form_tls_address be used?
https://dwarfstd.org/issues/110803.1.html

Thanks,
Ian

> Thanks,
> Namhyung