[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240206120643.1d30764c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 12:06:43 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, Intel Graphics
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>, Inki Dae
<inki.dae@...sung.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Michael Trimarchi
<michael@...rulasolutions.com>, Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Robert
Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 11:59:56 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
>
> between commit:
>
> ff3d5d04db07 ("drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Don't use FORCE_STOP_STATE")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> b2fe2292624a ("drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: enter display mode in the enable() callback")
>
> from the drm-misc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below, please check) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
I changed my mind and just used the latter version of this file.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists