lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 12:34:59 +0100
From: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, 
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, 
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree

Hi Michael,

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:29 PM Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen and all,
>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
> >>
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >>
> >> between commit:
> >>
> >>   ff3d5d04db07 ("drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Don't use
> >> FORCE_STOP_STATE")
> >>
> >> from Linus' tree and commit:
> >>
> >>   b2fe2292624a ("drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: enter display mode in the
> >> enable() callback")
> >>
> >> from the drm-misc tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (see below, please check) and can carry the fix as
> >> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but
> >> any
> >> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> >> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to
> >> consider
> >> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise
> >> any
> >> particularly complex conflicts.
> >
> > I changed my mind and just used the latter version of this file.
>
> Bug wise, this is the wrong solution. Because it will reintroduce the
> faulty FORCE_STOP_STATE. Also keep in mind, my fixes commit is/was
> already
> backported to the stable series.
>
> See also the discussion at [1]. Unfortunately, there was no conculusion
> yet.
> I think [2] is the proper resolution, at least for the commit
> b2fe2292624a
> ("drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: enter display mode in the enable()
> callback")
> I'm not sure in what state the drm-misc tree is.
>
> -michael
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/CAPM=9tytMB9frxNeD08hu1qsusY=wEE3bJOFmUgA1rSpabwDpg@mail.gmail.com/
> [2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/31e1a38a1d012a32d6f7bc8372b6360e@kernelorg/


Unfortunately, in this recent period, I have been very busy and have
not been able to run tests on this matter.
As soon as I am able to do so, I will.

Thanks and regards,
Dario

-- 

Dario Binacchi

Senior Embedded Linux Developer

dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com

__________________________________


Amarula Solutions SRL

Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT

T. +39 042 243 5310
info@...rulasolutions.com

www.amarulasolutions.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ