lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 14:24:48 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/23] gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in
 gpio_device with SRCU

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 08:36:39PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 1:31 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

..

> >
> > >  int gpiod_get_direction(struct gpio_desc *desc)
> > >  {
> > > -     struct gpio_chip *gc;
> > >       unsigned long flags;
> > >       unsigned int offset;
> > >       int ret;
> > >
> > > -     gc = gpiod_to_chip(desc);
> > > +     if (!desc)
> > > +             /* Sane default is INPUT. */
> > > +             return 1;
> >
> > Hmm... I can't imagine how this value may anyhow be used / useful.
> 
> What else would you return for an optional (NULL) GPIO?

An error. If somebody asks for direction of the non-existing GPIO, there is no
(valid) answer for that.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ