lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:12:44 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
Cc: <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	<mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
	<perex@...ex.cz>,
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	<corbet@....net>,
	<lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	<andersson@...nel.org>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
	<broonie@...nel.org>,
	<bgoswami@...cinc.com>,
	<tiwai@...e.com>,
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 32/53] ALSA: usb-audio: Check for support for requested audio format

On Sat, 03 Feb 2024 03:36:24 +0100,
Wesley Cheng wrote:
> 
> Allow for checks on a specific USB audio device to see if a requested PCM
> format is supported.  This is needed for support when playback is
> initiated by the ASoC USB backend path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>

Just cosmetic:

> +struct snd_usb_stream *snd_usb_find_suppported_substream(int card_idx,
> +			struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params, int direction)
> +{
> +	struct snd_usb_audio *chip;
> +	struct snd_usb_substream *subs;
> +	struct snd_usb_stream *as;
> +	const struct audioformat *fmt;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Register mutex is held when populating and clearing usb_chip
> +	 * array.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&register_mutex);
> +	chip = usb_chip[card_idx];
> +	if (!chip) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&register_mutex);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (enable[card_idx]) {
> +		list_for_each_entry(as, &chip->pcm_list, list) {
> +			subs = &as->substream[direction];
> +			fmt = snd_usb_find_substream_format(subs, params);
> +			if (fmt) {
> +				mutex_unlock(&register_mutex);
> +				return as;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&register_mutex);

I prefer having the single lock/unlock call pair, e.g.

	struct snd_usb_stream *as, *ret;

	ret = NULL;
	mutex_lock(&register_mutex);
	chip = usb_chip[card_idx];
	if (chip && enable[card_idx]) {
		list_for_each_entry(as, &chip->pcm_list, list) {
			subs = &as->substream[direction];
			if (snd_usb_find_substream_format(subs, params)) {
				ret = as;
				break;
			}
		}
	}
	mutex_unlock(&register_mutex);
	return ret;
}

In this case, we shouldn't reuse "as" for the return value since it
can be non-NULL after the loop end.


thanks,

Takashi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ