[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202402070806.445F7F7F03@keescook>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 08:08:14 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] overflow: Introduce wrapping_inc() and
wrapping_dec()
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 05:31:54PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 5:24 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > This allows replacements of the idioms "var += offset" and "var -= offset"
> > with the wrapping_inc() and wrapping_dec() helpers respectively. They
> > will avoid wrap-around sanitizer instrumentation.
> >
> > Add to the selftests to validate behavior and lack of side-effects.
>
> I would expect inc/dec to add/subtract 1. So, to me the terminology is
> confusing. The list of the C/C++ operators on Wikipedia describes
> above as
>
> += Assignment by sum
> -= Assignment by difference
>
>
> Hence the proposal is to have
>
> wrapping_sum()
> wrapping_diff()
I think maybe the missing phrase is "assign", which is what makes
argument 1 "special" -- it's being changed. Perhaps:
wrapping_add_assign()
wrapping_sub_assign()
?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists