[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQ4UZGOJg=DCEokKEP7e5S62pSax+XOgiBB-qQ=WGCbOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 13:12:13 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] LSM: add security_execve_abort() hook
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 12:57 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 16:45, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, let's get confirmation from Tetsuo on the current state of
> > TOMOYO in Linus' tree. If it is currently broken [..]
>
> As far as I understand, the current state is working, just the horrid
> random flag.
>
> So I think the series is a cleanup and worth doing, but also not
> hugely urgent. But it would probably be good to just get this whole
> thing over and done with, rather than leave it lingering for another
> release for no reason.
I've always operated under a policy of "just fixes" during the -rcX
period of development, but you're the boss. Once we get something
suitable for merging I'll send it up to you after it has soaked in
linux-next for a bit.
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists