| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240207134600.5ab91ba8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 13:46:00 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>, Rodrigo Vivi
<rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Christian König
<christian.koenig@....com>, Somalapuram Amaranath
<Amaranath.Somalapuram@....com>, Intel Graphics
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
Hi all,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 12:28:22 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:41:10: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member named 'num_busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_placement'?
41 | .num_busy_placement = 1,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:41:31: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
41 | .num_busy_placement = 1,
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:41:31: note: (near initialization for 'sys_placement')
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:42:10: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member named 'busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_placement'?
42 | .busy_placement = &sys_placement_flags,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:42:27: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
42 | .busy_placement = &sys_placement_flags,
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:42:27: note: (near initialization for 'sys_placement')
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:55:10: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member named 'num_busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_placement'?
55 | .num_busy_placement = 1,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:55:31: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
55 | .num_busy_placement = 1,
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:55:31: note: (near initialization for 'tt_placement')
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:56:10: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member named 'busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_placement'?
56 | .busy_placement = &sys_placement_flags,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:56:27: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
56 | .busy_placement = &sys_placement_flags,
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:56:27: note: (near initialization for 'tt_placement')
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c: In function '__xe_bo_placement_for_flags':
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:233:18: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member named 'num_busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_placement'?
233 | .num_busy_placement = c,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:233:39: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
233 | .num_busy_placement = c,
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:233:39: note: (near initialization for '(anonymous)')
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:234:18: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member named 'busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_placement'?
234 | .busy_placement = bo->placements,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:234:35: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
234 | .busy_placement = bo->placements,
| ^~
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:234:35: note: (near initialization for '(anonymous)')
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c: In function 'xe_evict_flags':
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:254:36: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member named 'num_busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_placement'?
254 | placement->num_busy_placement = 0;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c: In function '__xe_bo_fixed_placement':
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:1356:18: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member named 'num_busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_placement'?
1356 | .num_busy_placement = 1,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:1356:39: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
1356 | .num_busy_placement = 1,
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:1356:39: note: (near initialization for '(anonymous)')
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:1357:18: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member named 'busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_placement'?
1357 | .busy_placement = place,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:1357:35: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
1357 | .busy_placement = place,
| ^~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:1357:35: note: (near initialization for '(anonymous)')
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c: In function 'xe_bo_migrate':
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:2115:19: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member named 'num_busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_placement'?
2115 | placement.num_busy_placement = 1;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:2117:19: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member named 'busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_placement'?
2117 | placement.busy_placement = &requested;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
> Caused by commit
>
> a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
>
> (and maybe others) from Linus' tree (v6.8-rc1).
Given that the latter above commit(s) are also in the drm-misc tree, I
have just used the drm-misc tree from next-20240205 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists