linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 1/1] Add 10EC5280 to bmi160_i2c ACPI IDs to allow binding on some devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed,  7 Feb 2024 20:55:50 +0100
From: Jesus Gonzalez <jesusmgh@...il.com>
To: andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
	jic23@...nel.org,
	lars@...afoo.de
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesus Gonzalez <jesusmgh@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/1] Add 10EC5280 to bmi160_i2c ACPI IDs to allow binding on some devices

"10EC5280" is used by several manufacturers like Lenovo, GPD, or AYA (and
probably others) in their ACPI table as the ID for the bmi160 IMU. This
means the bmi160_i2c driver won't bind to it, and the IMU is unavailable
to the user. Manufacturers have been approached on several occasions to
try getting a BIOS with a fixed ID, mostly without actual positive
results, and since affected devices are already a few years old, this is
not expected to change. This patch enables using the bmi160_i2c driver for
the bmi160 IMU on these devices.

Here is the relevant extract from the DSDT of a GPD Win Max 2 (AMD 6800U
model) with the latest firmware 1.05 installed. GPD sees this as WONTFIX
with the argument of the device working with the Windows drivers.

	Device (BMA2)
	{
	    Name (_ADR, Zero)  // _ADR: Address
	    Name (_HID, "10EC5280")  // _HID: Hardware ID
	    Name (_CID, "10EC5280")  // _CID: Compatible ID
	    Name (_DDN, "Accelerometer")  // _DDN: DOS Device Name
	    Name (_UID, One)  // _UID: Unique ID
	    Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)  // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
	    {
		Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
		{
		    I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0069, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
		        AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.I2CC",
		        0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
		        )
		})
		Return (RBUF) /* \_SB_.I2CC.BMA2._CRS.RBUF */
	    }
	    
	    ...
	    
	}

Signed-off-by: Jesus Gonzalez <jesusmgh@...il.com>
---
v4: Moved comment back to relevant position inside function

 drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160_i2c.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160_i2c.c
index 81652c08e644..a081305254db 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160_i2c.c
@@ -43,6 +43,15 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id bmi160_i2c_id[] = {
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, bmi160_i2c_id);
 
 static const struct acpi_device_id bmi160_acpi_match[] = {
+	/*
+	 * FIRMWARE BUG WORKAROUND
+	 * Some manufacturers like GPD, Lenovo or Aya used the incorrect
+	 * ID "10EC5280" for bmi160 in their DSDT. A fixed firmware is not
+	 * available as of Feb 2024 after trying to work with OEMs, and
+	 * this is not expected to change anymore since at least some of
+	 * the affected devices are from 2021/2022.
+	 */
+	{"10EC5280", 0},
 	{"BMI0160", 0},
 	{ },
 };
-- 
2.43.0