[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <092a230a-05cb-48ae-daa0-607b15b30177@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:05:11 -0800
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn
Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/msm/dpu: support binding to the mdp5 devices
On 2/7/2024 11:56 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 20:48, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/5/2024 3:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> Existing MDP5 devices have slightly different bindings. The main
>>> register region is called `mdp_phys' instead of `mdp'. Also vbif
>>> register regions are a part of the parent, MDSS device. Add support for
>>> handling this binding differences.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h | 3 +
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_io_utils.c | 13 +++++
>>> 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>>> index 723cc1d82143..aa9e0ad33ebb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>>> @@ -1197,6 +1197,78 @@ static int dpu_kms_init(struct drm_device *ddev)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int dpu_kms_mmap_mdp5(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms)
>>> +{
>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = dpu_kms->pdev;
>>> + struct platform_device *mdss_dev;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (dpu_kms->pdev->dev.bus != &platform_bus_type)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>
>> !dev_is_platform() perhaps?
>
> looks good
>
>>
>> But I would like to understand this check a bit more. Can you pls
>> explain for which case this check was added?
>
> It is necessary to be sure that we can perform to_platform_device() on
> the next line.
>
Got it but on the next line we are using to_platform_device on dpu's
parent device. So shouldnt the check also be dpu_kms->pdev->dev.parent.bus?
>>
>>> + mdss_dev = to_platform_device(dpu_kms->pdev->dev.parent);
>>> +
>>> + dpu_kms->mmio = msm_ioremap(pdev, "mdp_phys");
>>> + if (IS_ERR(dpu_kms->mmio)) {
>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(dpu_kms->mmio);
>>> + DPU_ERROR("mdp register memory map failed: %d\n", ret);
>>> + dpu_kms->mmio = NULL;
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> + DRM_DEBUG("mapped dpu address space @%pK\n", dpu_kms->mmio);
>>> +
>>> + dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT] = msm_ioremap_mdss(mdss_dev,
>>> + dpu_kms->pdev,
>>> + "vbif_phys");
>>> + if (IS_ERR(dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT])) {
>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT]);
>>> + DPU_ERROR("vbif register memory map failed: %d\n", ret);
>>> + dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT] = NULL;
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_NRT] = msm_ioremap_mdss(mdss_dev,
>>> + dpu_kms->pdev,
>>> + "vbif_nrt_phys");
>>
>> Do you think a "quiet" version would be better?
>
> Yep, why not.
>
>>
>>
>>> + if (IS_ERR(dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_NRT])) {
>>> + dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_NRT] = NULL;
>>> + DPU_DEBUG("VBIF NRT is not defined");
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dpu_kms_mmap_dpu(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms)
>>> +{
>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = dpu_kms->pdev;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + dpu_kms->mmio = msm_ioremap(pdev, "mdp");
>>> + if (IS_ERR(dpu_kms->mmio)) {
>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(dpu_kms->mmio);
>>> + DPU_ERROR("mdp register memory map failed: %d\n", ret);
>>> + dpu_kms->mmio = NULL;
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> + DRM_DEBUG("mapped dpu address space @%pK\n", dpu_kms->mmio);
>>> +
>>> + dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT] = msm_ioremap(pdev, "vbif");
>>> + if (IS_ERR(dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT])) {
>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT]);
>>> + DPU_ERROR("vbif register memory map failed: %d\n", ret);
>>> + dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT] = NULL;
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_NRT] = msm_ioremap_quiet(pdev, "vbif_nrt");
>>> + if (IS_ERR(dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_NRT])) {
>>> + dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_NRT] = NULL;
>>> + DPU_DEBUG("VBIF NRT is not defined");
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int dpu_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> {
>>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> @@ -1230,28 +1302,12 @@ static int dpu_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>
>>> dpu_kms->base.irq = irq;
>>>
>>> - dpu_kms->mmio = msm_ioremap(pdev, "mdp");
>>> - if (IS_ERR(dpu_kms->mmio)) {
>>> - ret = PTR_ERR(dpu_kms->mmio);
>>> - DPU_ERROR("mdp register memory map failed: %d\n", ret);
>>> - dpu_kms->mmio = NULL;
>>> - return ret;
>>> - }
>>> - DRM_DEBUG("mapped dpu address space @%pK\n", dpu_kms->mmio);
>>> -
>>> - dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT] = msm_ioremap(pdev, "vbif");
>>> - if (IS_ERR(dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT])) {
>>> - ret = PTR_ERR(dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT]);
>>> - DPU_ERROR("vbif register memory map failed: %d\n", ret);
>>> - dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_RT] = NULL;
>>> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dpu_kms->pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,mdp5"))
>>> + ret = dpu_kms_mmap_mdp5(dpu_kms);
>>> + else
>>> + ret = dpu_kms_mmap_dpu(dpu_kms);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> return ret;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_NRT] = msm_ioremap_quiet(pdev, "vbif_nrt");
>>> - if (IS_ERR(dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_NRT])) {
>>> - dpu_kms->vbif[VBIF_NRT] = NULL;
>>> - DPU_DEBUG("VBIF NRT is not defined");
>>> - }
>>>
>>> ret = dpu_kms_parse_data_bus_icc_path(dpu_kms);
>>> if (ret)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
>>> index 16a7cbc0b7dd..01e783130054 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
>>> @@ -476,6 +476,9 @@ void __iomem *msm_ioremap(struct platform_device *pdev, const char *name);
>>> void __iomem *msm_ioremap_size(struct platform_device *pdev, const char *name,
>>> phys_addr_t *size);
>>> void __iomem *msm_ioremap_quiet(struct platform_device *pdev, const char *name);
>>> +void __iomem *msm_ioremap_mdss(struct platform_device *mdss_pdev,
>>> + struct platform_device *dev,
>>> + const char *name);
>>>
>>> struct icc_path *msm_icc_get(struct device *dev, const char *name);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_io_utils.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_io_utils.c
>>> index 59d2788c4510..afedd61c3e28 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_io_utils.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_io_utils.c
>>> @@ -50,6 +50,19 @@ struct clk *msm_clk_get(struct platform_device *pdev, const char *name)
>>> return clk;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void __iomem *msm_ioremap_mdss(struct platform_device *mdss_pdev,
>>> + struct platform_device *pdev,
>>> + const char *name)
>>> +{
>>> + struct resource *res;
>>> +
>>> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(mdss_pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, name);
>>> + if (!res)
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> +
>>> + return devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void __iomem *_msm_ioremap(struct platform_device *pdev, const char *name,
>>> bool quiet, phys_addr_t *psize)
>>> {
>>>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists