[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbe544de-dc04-59a8-6642-883fc00214f3@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 17:24:46 -0800
From: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC: <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
<perex@...ex.cz>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <corbet@....net>,
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<bgoswami@...cinc.com>, <tiwai@...e.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 48/53] ALSA: usb-audio: mixer: Add USB offloading
mixer control
Hi Takashi,
On 2/6/2024 4:57 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Feb 2024 03:36:40 +0100,
> Wesley Cheng wrote:
>>
>> In order to allow userspace/applications know about USB offloading status,
>> expose a sound kcontrol that fetches information about which sound card
>> index is associated with the ASoC platform card supporting offloading. In
>> the USB audio offloading framework, the ASoC BE DAI link is the entity
>> responsible for registering to the SOC USB layer. SOC USB will expose more
>> details about the current offloading status, which includes the USB sound
>> card and USB PCM device indexes currently being used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
>
> The concept is understandable, but the control element name ("SNDUSB
> OFFLD playback available") looks non-intrusive and non-conformant.
> Use a bit more understandable name instead.
>
> This provides a card number where the offload driver is bound, and the
> name should indicate something about that.
>
Hmmm, does USB sound have a naming convention that it usually follows
for mixer/control interfaces?
For something that is more closely related, how about:
"USB offload capable card"
> Also, about the implementation:
>
>> +static int
>> +snd_usb_offload_create_mixer(struct usb_mixer_interface *mixer,
>> + const struct snd_kcontrol_new *new_kctl)
>> +{
>> + struct snd_kcontrol *kctl;
>> + struct usb_mixer_elem_info *elem;
>> +
>> + elem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct usb_mixer_elem_info), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!elem)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + elem->head.mixer = mixer;
>> + elem->val_type = USB_MIXER_S32;
>> + elem->control = 0;
>> + elem->head.id = 0;
>> + elem->channels = 1;
>> +
>> + kctl = snd_ctl_new1(new_kctl, elem);
>> + if (!kctl) {
>> + kfree(elem);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + kctl->private_free = snd_usb_mixer_elem_free;
>> +
>> + return snd_usb_mixer_add_control(&elem->head, kctl);
>
> This control has almost little to do with the standard USB interface,
> and it'll be much simpler if you create a raw control element.
> Pass the bus or the sysdev to private_data, and that's all you need in
> the get callback.
>
Sure, I'll remove the need to register over the SND USB mixer API, and
just use the core SND control APIs.
> Also, don't forget to set the proper access bits (it's read-only).
>
Thanks for pointing this out, will fix.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists