[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f46035e-d21d-4033-a43a-3fbb2ae89f7f@leemhuis.info>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:22:58 +0100
From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/326] 6.6.16-rc2 review
On 07.02.24 11:09, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 08:04:49AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>> On 04.02.24 05:43, Стас Ничипорович wrote:
>>> After trying again to create the ipset with timeout option I get a kernel panic
>>> # ipset create throttled-ips hash:ip family inet hashsize 1024 maxelem
>>> 100000 timeout 600 bucketsize 12 initval 0x22b96e3a
>>> ipset v7.20: Set cannot be created: set with the same name already exists
>>
>> To be sure the issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm
>> adding it to regzbot, the Linux kernel regression tracking bot:
>>
>> #regzbot ^introduced fdb8e12cc2cc
>> #regzbot title netfilter: WARNING when using ipset with timeout option
>> #regzbot fix: netfilter: ipset: Missing gc cancellations fixed
>> #regzbot ignore-activity
>
> Note, this did not get applied to the stable kernels, so it's an issue
> in Linus's tree only, with a proposed fix already posted (and might be
> in linux-next already, haven't checked...)
Thx, but don't worry, I know. It's just that the patch didn't make any
progress in the last few days, that's why I decided to now add it to the
tracking.
As I just noticed I apparently did so with the wrong commit-id, which I
just picked from the proposed fix without verifying. :-/ Will fix this
up for regzbot and tell Jozsef.
#regzbot 97f7cf1cd80eee
#regzbot monitor
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240204152642.1394588-1-kadlec@netfilter.org/
Thx again. Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists