[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h6ikmqqo.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 12:57:19 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>, Juri Lelli
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Leonardo Bras
<leobras@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Marcelo
Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/12] timekeeping_notify: use stop_machine_fail when
appropriate
On Tue, Feb 06 2024 at 15:49, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Change timekeeping_notify to use stop_machine_fail when appropriate,
> which will fail in case the target CPU is tagged as block interference
> CPU.
You completely fail to explain 'appropriate'. There is zero reason for
this churn, really.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists