[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240207134103.1357162-7-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 14:46:55 +0106
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH printk v4 06/14] printk: For @suppress_panic_printk check for other CPU in panic
Currently @suppress_panic_printk is checked along with
non-matching @panic_cpu and current CPU. This works
because @suppress_panic_printk is only set when
panic_in_progress() is true.
Rather than relying on the @suppress_panic_printk semantics,
use the concise helper function other_cpu_in_progress(). The
helper function exists to avoid open coding such tests.
Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
---
kernel/printk/printk.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index be95a6851164..22bb45d8f2f2 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -2270,8 +2270,7 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level,
if (unlikely(suppress_printk))
return 0;
- if (unlikely(suppress_panic_printk) &&
- atomic_read(&panic_cpu) != raw_smp_processor_id())
+ if (unlikely(suppress_panic_printk) && other_cpu_in_panic())
return 0;
if (level == LOGLEVEL_SCHED) {
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists