lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 19:15:38 +0530
From: Kamlesh Gurudasani <kamlesh@...com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>
CC: <kristo@...nel.org>, <ssantosh@...nel.org>, <chandru@...com>,
        <rishabh@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] clk: keystone: sci-clk: Adding support for non
 contiguous clocks

Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> writes:

>
> A bit too nice coding ;) => I had been confused momentarily by clk_id = args.args[1]
> change just above till I saw that you are pre-incrementing
> clk_id - Is there a harm in leaving the original clk_id increment logic
> alone (it was much simpler to read up)?
>
Personlly, I think this is simpler as this keeps everything related to
parents inside while loop and increment only at one place.

The other logic will have increment inside condition and also at 2 other
places.

Let's Udit take a call.

Kamlesh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ