[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a639ec29-2941-470a-8027-7ec6246a4c7d@mailbox.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 15:07:47 +0100
From: Tor Vic <torvic9@...lbox.org>
To: "Yuan, Perry" <Perry.Yuan@....com>, "Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>,
"Shenoy, Gautham Ranjal" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix min_perf assignment in
amd_pstate_adjust_perf()
On 2/7/24 14:54, Yuan, Perry wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>
> Hi Tor,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tor Vic <torvic9@...lbox.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 9:09 PM
>> To: Huang, Ray <Ray.Huang@....com>; Yuan, Perry
>> <Perry.Yuan@....com>; rafael@...nel.org
>> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; linux-
>> pm@...r.kernel.org; Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
>> Subject: [PATCH][next] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix min_perf assignment in
>> amd_pstate_adjust_perf()
>>
>> In the function amd_pstate_adjust_perf(), the 'min_perf' variable is set to
>> 'highest_perf' instead of 'lowest_perf'.
>>
>> Fixes: 1d215f0319c2 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add fast switch function for AMD
>> P-State")
>> Reported-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
>> Signed-off-by: Tor Vic <torvic9@...lbox.org>
>> ---
>> IIRC, this was first reported by Oleksandr, hence the 'Reported-by' tag.
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
>> index 08e112444c27..aa5e57e27d2b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
>> @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
>> if (target_perf < capacity)
>> des_perf = DIV_ROUND_UP(cap_perf * target_perf,
>> capacity);
>>
>> - min_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf);
>> + min_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf);
>> if (_min_perf < capacity)
>> min_perf = DIV_ROUND_UP(cap_perf * _min_perf, capacity);
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>
> Thanks for the fix!
I think this is actually for stable and mainline too, not only for -next.
Should I resend with 'Cc: stable' tag and your Reviewed-by?
>
> Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists