[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcOP6bm0ekxDUVk6@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 15:12:57 +0100
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sched/vtime: do not include <asm/vtime.h> header
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 12:30:08AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Thank you for the review, Frederic!
The Heiko comment is valid and I would add this chunk in v2:
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild
@@ -6,5 +6,4 @@ generic-y += agp.h
generic-y += kvm_types.h
generic-y += mcs_spinlock.h
generic-y += qrwlock.h
-generic-y += vtime.h
generic-y += early_ioremap.h
Would you keep your Reviewed-by?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists