[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240207233154.cd38fd0bf4891d66807c4ed9@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 23:31:54 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Cc: <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] tracing/probes: support '%pd/%pD' type for
fprobe
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:39:19 +0800
Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com> wrote:
> Support print type '%pd/%pD' for print dentry's or file's name.
>
nit: Looks good to me. but the patch ordering seems a bit strange.
This should be next to [2/8].
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thank you,
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
> index 7d2ddbcfa377..988d68e906ad 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
> @@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static int __trace_fprobe_create(int argc, const char *argv[])
> char gbuf[MAX_EVENT_NAME_LEN];
> char sbuf[KSYM_NAME_LEN];
> char abuf[MAX_BTF_ARGS_LEN];
> + char *dbuf = NULL;
> bool is_tracepoint = false;
> struct tracepoint *tpoint = NULL;
> struct traceprobe_parse_context ctx = {
> @@ -1086,6 +1087,10 @@ static int __trace_fprobe_create(int argc, const char *argv[])
> argv = new_argv;
> }
>
> + ret = traceprobe_expand_dentry_args(argc, argv, &dbuf);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> /* setup a probe */
> tf = alloc_trace_fprobe(group, event, symbol, tpoint, maxactive,
> argc, is_return);
> @@ -1131,6 +1136,7 @@ static int __trace_fprobe_create(int argc, const char *argv[])
> trace_probe_log_clear();
> kfree(new_argv);
> kfree(symbol);
> + kfree(dbuf);
> return ret;
>
> parse_error:
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists