linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 03/20] KVM: xen: mark guest pages dirty with the pfncache lock held

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZcOelockFh47Xu3s@google.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 07:15:34 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Paul Durrant <paul@....org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, 
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 03/20] KVM: xen: mark guest pages dirty with the
 pfncache lock held

On Tue, Feb 06, 2024, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 19:17 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > KVM: x86/xen: for the scope please.  A few commits have "KVM: xen:", but "x86/xen"
> > is the overwhelming favorite.
> 
> Paul's been using "KVM: xen:" in this patch series since first posting
> it in September of last year. If there aren't more substantial changes
> you need, would you perhaps be able to make that minor fixup as you
> apply the series?

Yes, I can fixup scopes when applying, though I think in this case there's just
enough small changes that another version would be helpful.  Tweaks to the scope
are rarely grounds for needing a new version.  I'd say "never", but then someone
would inevitably prove me wrong :-)