linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] spi: s3c64xx: explicitly include <linux/types.h>

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPLW+4n_1yBOuzW3Ke2DKh_0EBZMUrd3nyGd=U0TeOML_2dXuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:42:20 -0600
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, broonie@...nel.org, andi.shyti@...nel.org, 
	krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, 
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	andre.draszik@...aro.org, peter.griffin@...aro.org, kernel-team@...roid.com, 
	willmcvicker@...gle.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] spi: s3c64xx: explicitly include <linux/types.h>

On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 12:21 AM Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aroorg> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/6/24 18:02, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 2:52 AM Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> The driver uses u32 and relies on an implicit inclusion of
> >> <linux/types.h>.
> >>
> >> It is good practice to directly include all headers used, it avoids
> >> implicit dependencies and spurious breakage if someone rearranges
> >> headers and causes the implicit include to vanish.
> >>
> >> Include the missing header.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 230d42d422e7 ("spi: Add s3c64xx SPI Controller driver")
> >
> > Not sure if Fixes tag is needed here.
>
> We have already talked about this. If a patch that causes the implicit
> include to vanish is backported to stable, it will reveal the missing
> header here and will result in backporting this patch as well. So, as a
> good practice let's allow this patch to be queued to stable, it will
> avoid possible compilation errors.
>
> I guess Mark has to break the tie again. Or Greg if he cares, I added
> him in To:.
>
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 1 +
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> >> index 72c35dbe53b2..c15ca6a910dc 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> >> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> >>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >>  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> >> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >
> > Is this really needed for the further patches in this series?
> >
>
> Yes, because in patch 3/4 I use u8 and u16 and I don't want to use those
> without having the header included. Do you find this wrong?
>

I'd say if this header is really needed for your patch 3/4 to have a
successful build, just merge this patch into the patch 3/4 then.

> >>
> >>  #define MAX_SPI_PORTS          12
> >>  #define S3C64XX_SPI_QUIRK_CS_AUTO      (1 << 1)
> >> --
> >> 2.43.0.594.gd9cf4e227d-goog
> >>