linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/7] cpuidle: Handle TIF_NR_POLLING on behalf of CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 18:03:23 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] cpuidle: Handle TIF_NR_POLLING on behalf of
 CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING_HARD states

Le Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 02:21:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:32 PM Frederic Weisbecker
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int call_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> > -                     int next_state)
> 
> Since you are removing call_cpuidle(), you may as well remove
> call_cpuidle_s2idle() which only has one caller anyway.

Doing so in a seperate patch. Thanks!