[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e549d87d37bbd859be59acd4fab85b43@paul-moore.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 22:18:55 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, chuck.lever@...cle.com, jlayton@...nel.org, neilb@...e.de, kolga@...app.com, Dai.Ngo@...cle.com, tom@...pey.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, eric.snowberg@...cle.com, dhowells@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org, stephen.smalley.work@...il.com, eparis@...isplace.org, casey@...aufler-ca.com, shuah@...nel.org, mic@...ikod.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 25/25] integrity: Remove LSM
On Jan 15, 2024 Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> Since now IMA and EVM use their own integrity metadata, it is safe to
> remove the 'integrity' LSM, with its management of integrity metadata.
>
> Keep the iint.c file only for loading IMA and EVM keys at boot, and for
> creating the integrity directory in securityfs (we need to keep it for
> retrocompatibility reasons).
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
> ---
> include/linux/integrity.h | 14 ---
> security/integrity/iint.c | 197 +--------------------------------
> security/integrity/integrity.h | 25 -----
> security/security.c | 2 -
> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 236 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists