linux-kernel - Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] tracing the source of errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <875xyyvggi.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:39:09 -0500
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,  lsf-pc
 <lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,  linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] tracing the source of errors

Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> writes:

> On Wed 07-02-24 10:54:34, Miklos Szeredi via Lsf-pc wrote:
>> [I'm not planning to attend LSF this year, but I thought this topic
>> might be of interest to those who will.]
>> 
>> The errno thing is really ancient and yet quite usable.  But when
>> trying to find out where a particular EINVAL is coming from, that's
>> often mission impossible.
>> 
>> Would it make sense to add infrastructure to allow tracing the source
>> of errors?  E.g.
>> 
>> strace --errno-trace ls -l foo
>> ...
>> statx(AT_FDCWD, "foo", ...) = -1 ENOENT [fs/namei.c:1852]
>> ...
>> 
>> Don't know about others, but this issue comes up quite often for me.
>
> Yes, having this available would be really useful at times. Sometimes I
> had to resort to kprobes or good old printks.
>
>> I would implement this with macros that record the place where a
>> particular error has originated, and some way to query the last one
>> (which wouldn't be 100% accurate, but good enough I guess).
>
> The problem always has been how to implement this functionality in a
> transparent way so the code does not become a mess. So if you have some
> idea, I'd say go for it :)

I had a proposal to provide the LoC of filesystem errors as part of an
extended record of the FAN_FS_ERROR messages (fanotify interface).  It
might be a sensible interface to expose this information if not
prohibitively expensive.

One might record the position with a macro and do the fsnotify_sb_error
from a safer context.

-- 
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi