linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8150: Add gcc_parents_0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 10:48:39 +0530
From: "Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson
	<andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "Stephen
 Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof
 Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ajit Pandey
	<quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
        Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
        "Jagadeesh Kona" <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8150: Add gcc_parents_0_ao support


On 2/5/2024 5:03 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 5.02.2024 09:37, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
>> On 1/25/2024 3:25 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/25/24 06:49, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
>>>> On 1/23/2024 11:17 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/23/24 17:34, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
>>>>>> Add active_only support for gcc_parents_0, this is needed because
>>>>>> some of the clocks under it are critical which would vote on xo
>>>>>> blocking the suspend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>> Is there a need to keep gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src around? Do we do any
>>>>> ratesetting on it? Should we ever turn it off?
>>>>>
>>>> The branch clocks under gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src are critical clocks, which are running at 19.2Mhz causing vote on XO during suspend. As of now no rate setting is happening but this rcg is useful to get the exact rates from debugfs. Hence this change is needed to avoid XO shutdown issues.
>>> So, if I underderstood you correctly, this clock serves no purpose other
>>> than getting rate?
>>>
>>> In this case, I'd say we should de-register it from the clock driver and
>>> use debugcc [1] (contributions welcome!) for precise measurements.
>>>
>> Although currently there is no rate-setting happening now, its better to keep the rcg modelling as is, considering that it might be needed if some use case arises in future.
> We don't tend to solve imaginary problems, please lay out what it would be
> used for, if at all. Then, we can assess whether it's necessary.


Okay, I'll de-register this RCG.