linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 16/20] dt-bindings: crypto: meson: support new SoC's

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b2e4ac25-5b07-46c7-a96f-8390a95584ea@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:38:36 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Alexey Romanov <avromanov@...utedevices.com>, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
 clabbe@...libre.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
 robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 khilman@...libre.com, jbrunet@...libre.com,
 martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...utedevices.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/20] dt-bindings: crypto: meson: support new SoC's

On 05/02/2024 16:55, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> Now crypto module available at G12A/G12B/S4/A1/SM1/AXG.
> 
> 1. Add new compatibles:
>   - amlogic,g12a-crypto
>   - amlogic,s4-crypto (uses g12a-crypto as fallback)
>   - amlogic,a1-crypto (uses g12a-crypto as fallback)
>   - amlogic,axg-crypto
> 
> 2. All SoC's, exclude GXL, doesn't take a clock input for
> Crypto IP. Make it required only for amlogic,gxl-crypto.
> 
> 3. All SoC's, exclude GXL, uses only one interrupt flow
> for Crypto IP.
> 
> 4. Add power-domains in schema.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Romanov <avromanov@...utedevices.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/crypto/amlogic,gxl-crypto.yaml   | 44 +++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/amlogic,gxl-crypto.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/amlogic,gxl-crypto.yaml
> index 948e11ebe4ee..62f772036b06 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/amlogic,gxl-crypto.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/amlogic,gxl-crypto.yaml
> @@ -11,20 +11,30 @@ maintainers:
>  
>  properties:
>    compatible:
> -    items:
> -      - const: amlogic,gxl-crypto
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - amlogic,a1-crypto
> +              - amlogic,s4-crypto
> +          - const: amlogic,g12a-crypto
> +      - items:
> +          - const: amlogic,gxl-crypto
> +      - items:
> +          - const: amlogic,axg-crypto
> +      - items:
> +          - const: amlogic,g12a-crypto

You just ignored my comment, so repeat: that's just enum with three entries.

>  
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> -  interrupts:
> -    items:
> -      - description: Interrupt for flow 0
> -      - description: Interrupt for flow 1
> +  interrupts: true

No, you need widest constraints here.

>  
>    clocks:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  power-domains:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
>    clock-names:
>      const: blkmv
>  
> @@ -32,8 +42,26 @@ required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
>    - interrupts
> -  - clocks
> -  - clock-names
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            const: amlogic,gxl-crypto
> +    then:
> +      required:
> +        - clocks
> +        - clock-names
> +      properties:
> +        interrupts:
> +          maxItems: 2
> +          minItems: 2

Instead describe items like it was in original code.

> +    else:
> +      properties:
> +        interrupts:
> +          maxItems: 1
> +          minItems: 1

and what interrupt is expected here?

>  
>  additionalProperties: false
>  

Best regards,
Krzysztof