[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6bcde7e-af39-4de2-b77a-781ccf80c854@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:22:33 -0300
From: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Boqun Feng
<boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>, Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Carlos Llamas
<cmllamas@...gle.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] rust: types: add `NotThreadSafe`
On 2/2/24 07:55, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> This introduces a new marker type for types that shouldn't be thread
> safe. By adding a field of this type to a struct, it becomes non-Send
> and non-Sync, which means that it cannot be accessed in any way from
> threads other than the one it was created on.
>
> This is useful for APIs that require globals such as `current` to remain
> constant while the value exists.
>
> We update two existing users in the Kernel to use this helper:
>
> * `Task::current()` - moving the return type of this value to a
> different thread would not be safe as you can no longer be guaranteed
> that the `current` pointer remains valid.
> * Lock guards. Mutexes and spinlocks should be unlocked on the same
> thread as where they were locked, so we enforce this using the Send
> trait.
>
> There are also additional users in later patches of this patchset. See
> [1] and [2] for the discussion that led to the introducion of this
> patch.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/nFDPJFnzE9Q5cqY7FwSMByRH2OAn_BpI4H53NQfWIlN6I2qfmAqnkp2wRqn0XjMO65OyZY4h6P4K2nAGKJpAOSzksYXaiAK_FoH_8QbgBI4=@proton.me/ [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/nFDPJFnzE9Q5cqY7FwSMByRH2OAn_BpI4H53NQfWIlN6I2qfmAqnkp2wRqn0XjMO65OyZY4h6P4K2nAGKJpAOSzksYXaiAK_FoH_8QbgBI4=@proton.me/ [2]
> Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> ---
> [...]
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists