[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2219df60-7235-4c37-b79c-25e7225cb7a9@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 10:01:30 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, jonas@...boo.se,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
manikandan.m@...rochip.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, geert+renesas@...der.be, arnd@...db.de,
palmer@...osinc.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gerg@...ux-m68k.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, vbabka@...e.cz, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: display: bridge: add sam9x75-lvds
compatible
On 07/02/2024 11:27, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
> Add the 'sam9x75-lvds' compatible binding, which describes the Low Voltage
> Differential Signaling (LVDS) Controller found on some Microchip's sam9x7
> series System-on-Chip (SoC) devices. This binding will be used to define
> the properties and configuration for the LVDS Controller in DT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>
Not tested...
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.
Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.
You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.
Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists