[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240208102252.GB52537@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 12:22:52 +0200
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, kristo@...nel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: ti: Convert interface.txt to
json-schema
Hi,
* Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> [231128 17:16]:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 09:23:59PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > Convert the OMAP interface clock device tree binding to json-schema
> > and fix up reg property which is optional and taken from parent if
> > not specified.
> > Specify the creator of the original binding as a maintainer.
>
> Great! This and other TI clocks are at the top of the list[1] of
> occurrences of undocumented (by schemas) compatibles:
>
> 3763 ['ti,omap3-interface-clock']
> 3249 ['ti,divider-clock']
> 1764 ['ti,mux-clock']
> 1680 ['ti,gate-clock']
> 1522 ['ti,wait-gate-clock']
> 1459 ['ti,composite-clock']
> 1343 ['ti,composite-mux-clock']
> 1341 ['ti,clkctrl']
> 1296 ['fsl,imx6q-ssi', 'fsl,imx51-ssi']
> 1196 ['ti,composite-gate-clock']
> 1032 ['ti,clockdomain']
>
> Of course, that's largely due to OMAP being early clock adopter and
> trying to do fine-grained clocks in DT.
So related to dealing with the warnings above, and the numerous
warnings for unique_unit_address, I suggest we update the clksel clock
children for the standard reg property as we already discussed a bit
earlier.
The suggested patch for the am3 clksel children is below for reference.
I have at least one issue to sort out before I can post proper patches.
The issue I'm seeing is that updating omap3 clkcsel clocks in a similar
way adds a new error that gets multiplied by about 50 times as the
dss_tv_fck and dss_96m_fck both seem to really be gated by the same
bit..
I think the dss_tv_fck might be derived from the dss_96m_fck really,
and the documentation is wrong. If anybody has more info on this please
let me know, otherwise I guess I'll just leave the clock@e00 not updated
for now.
Regards,
Tony
> [1] https://gitlab.com/robherring/linux-dt/-/jobs/5620809910#L5618
>
8< ---------------------------
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/am33xx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/am33xx-clocks.dtsi
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/am33xx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/am33xx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -108,30 +108,31 @@ clock@664 {
compatible = "ti,clksel";
reg = <0x664>;
#clock-cells = <2>;
- #address-cells = <0>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
- ehrpwm0_tbclk: clock-ehrpwm0-tbclk {
+ ehrpwm0_tbclk: clock-ehrpwm0-tbclk@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,gate-clock";
clock-output-names = "ehrpwm0_tbclk";
clocks = <&l4ls_gclk>;
- ti,bit-shift = <0>;
};
- ehrpwm1_tbclk: clock-ehrpwm1-tbclk {
+ ehrpwm1_tbclk: clock-ehrpwm1-tbclk@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,gate-clock";
clock-output-names = "ehrpwm1_tbclk";
clocks = <&l4ls_gclk>;
- ti,bit-shift = <1>;
};
- ehrpwm2_tbclk: clock-ehrpwm2-tbclk {
+ ehrpwm2_tbclk: clock-ehrpwm2-tbclk@2 {
+ reg = <2>;
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,gate-clock";
clock-output-names = "ehrpwm2_tbclk";
clocks = <&l4ls_gclk>;
- ti,bit-shift = <2>;
};
};
};
@@ -566,17 +567,19 @@ clock@52c {
compatible = "ti,clksel";
reg = <0x52c>;
#clock-cells = <2>;
- #address-cells = <0>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
- gfx_fclk_clksel_ck: clock-gfx-fclk-clksel {
+ gfx_fclk_clksel_ck: clock-gfx-fclk-clksel@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,mux-clock";
clock-output-names = "gfx_fclk_clksel_ck";
clocks = <&dpll_core_m4_ck>, <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
- ti,bit-shift = <1>;
};
- gfx_fck_div_ck: clock-gfx-fck-div {
+ gfx_fck_div_ck: clock-gfx-fck-div@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
clock-output-names = "gfx_fck_div_ck";
@@ -589,30 +592,32 @@ clock@700 {
compatible = "ti,clksel";
reg = <0x700>;
#clock-cells = <2>;
- #address-cells = <0>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
- sysclkout_pre_ck: clock-sysclkout-pre {
+ sysclkout_pre_ck: clock-sysclkout-pre@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,mux-clock";
clock-output-names = "sysclkout_pre_ck";
clocks = <&clk_32768_ck>, <&l3_gclk>, <&dpll_ddr_m2_ck>, <&dpll_per_m2_ck>, <&lcd_gclk>;
};
- clkout2_div_ck: clock-clkout2-div {
+ clkout2_div_ck: clock-clkout2-div@3 {
+ reg = <3>;
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
clock-output-names = "clkout2_div_ck";
clocks = <&sysclkout_pre_ck>;
- ti,bit-shift = <3>;
ti,max-div = <8>;
};
- clkout2_ck: clock-clkout2 {
+ clkout2_ck: clock-clkout2@7 {
+ reg = <7>;
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,gate-clock";
clock-output-names = "clkout2_ck";
clocks = <&clkout2_div_ck>;
- ti,bit-shift = <7>;
};
};
};
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists