linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add CPUCP mailbox controller bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8865b33b-8dd6-73bf-1d34-919c6bcff65c@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 15:58:10 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <sudeep.holla@....com>, <cristian.marussi@....com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_rgottimu@...cinc.com>, <quic_kshivnan@...cinc.com>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add CPUCP mailbox
 controller bindings



On 1/30/24 22:42, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:04:52PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> Add devicetree binding for CPUSS Control Processor (CPUCP) mailbox
>> controller.

Hey Rob,

Thanks for taking time to review the series.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/mailbox/qcom,cpucp-mbox.yaml     | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,cpucp-mbox.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,cpucp-mbox.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,cpucp-mbox.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..2617e5555acb
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,cpucp-mbox.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mailbox/qcom,cpucp-mbox.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. CPUCP Mailbox Controller
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@....qualcomm.com>
>> +
>> +description:
>> +  The CPUSS Control Processor (CPUCP) mailbox controller enables communication
>> +  between AP and CPUCP by acting as a doorbell between them.
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    items:
>> +      - enum:
>> +          - qcom,x1e80100-cpucp-mbox
>> +      - const: qcom,cpucp-mbox
> 
> A generic fallback implies multiple devices use the same unchanged
> block. That seems doubtful given you have not defined any others and
> given Konrad's comments.

This mbox is expected to be used as is on a number of future SoCs,
that's the only reason I added the generic fallback. I can drop it
in the next re-spin if you want.

-Sibi

> 
> Rob