lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABXGCsN5_O3iKDOyYxtsGTGDA6fw4962CjzXLSnOK3rscELq+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 15:32:05 +0500
From: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Christian A. Ehrhardt" <lk@...e.de>, niklas.neronin@...ux.intel.com, 
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: This is the fourth time I’ve tried to find what led to the regression of outgoing network speed and each time I find the merge commit 8c94ccc7cd691472461448f98e2372c75849406c

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 2:23 PM Mathias Nyman
<mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> My guess is that CPU0 spends more time with interrupts disabled than other CPUs.
> Either because it's handling interrupts from some other hardware, or running
> code that disables interrupts (for example kernel code inside spin_lock_irq),
> and thus not able to handle network adapter interrupts at the same rate as CPU23
>

Can this be fixed?
Can I help you here with anything else?

-- 
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ