[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH5fLgh2mqX7O=xWN6=wyd_4=_R63Ko-wh0bb=rXvLrrj=W-pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 15:12:48 +0100
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>
Cc: Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>, Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org" <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rust: add abstraction for `struct page`
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 3:02 PM Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sungcom> wrote:
>
>
> Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 7:02 AM Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 6:22 AM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com> wrote:
> >> > +/// A pointer to a page that owns the page allocation.
> >> > +///
> >> > +/// # Invariants
> >> > +///
> >> > +/// The pointer points at a page, and has ownership over the page.
> >> > +pub struct Page {
> >> > + page: NonNull<bindings::page>,
> >> > +}
> >>
> >> Shouldn't this be UnsafeCell / Opaque? Since `struct page` contains locks.
> >
> > That only matters when we use a reference. Here, it's behind a raw pointer.
>
> Why is it behind a pointer rather than being transparent over
> `Opaque<bindings::page>` and using a `&Page` instead?
Because `&Page` would not have ownership of the page, but I need
ownership. We also can't use `ARef<Page>` because that has a `clone`
method.
One could introduce an Owned smart pointer and use `Owned<Page>`, but
I think that is out of scope for this patchset.
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists