linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] serial: sc16is7xx: split into core and I2C/SPI parts (sc16is7xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240208102613.887945859e48f3b2d9519385@hugovil.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 10:26:13 -0500
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Hugo Villeneuve
 <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] serial: sc16is7xx: split into core and I2C/SPI
 parts (sc16is7xx_lines)

On Tue,  6 Feb 2024 16:42:07 -0500
Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:

> From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> 
> Before, sc16is7xx_lines was checked for a free (zero) bit first, and then
> later it was set only if UART port registration succeeded.
> 
> Now that sc16is7xx_lines is shared for the I2C and SPI drivers, make sure
> it is reserved and modified atomically, and use a new variable to hold the
> status of UART port regisration.
> 
> Remove need to check for previous port registration in sc16is7xx_remove(),
> because if sc16is7xx_probe() succeeded, we are guaranteed to have
> successfully registered both ports.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> index 5b53c88b7133..5073ebfc45bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> @@ -1468,6 +1468,7 @@ int sc16is7xx_probe(struct device *dev, const struct sc16is7xx_devtype *devtype,
>  	u32 uartclk = 0;
>  	int i, ret;
>  	struct sc16is7xx_port *s;
> +	bool port_registered[SC16IS7XX_MAX_PORTS];
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < devtype->nr_uart; i++)
>  		if (IS_ERR(regmaps[i]))
> @@ -1533,8 +1534,10 @@ int sc16is7xx_probe(struct device *dev, const struct sc16is7xx_devtype *devtype,
>  		     SC16IS7XX_IOCONTROL_SRESET_BIT);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < devtype->nr_uart; ++i) {
> -		s->p[i].port.line = find_first_zero_bit(sc16is7xx_lines,
> -							SC16IS7XX_MAX_DEVS);
> +		port_registered[i] = false;

I just realised that this will not work. All port_registered[]
members need to be initialized before entering the loop.

I will add this (for V2) before the loop:

  memset(port_registered, 0, sizeof(port_registered));

Hugo Villeneuve


> +
> +		s->p[i].port.line = find_and_set_bit(sc16is7xx_lines,
> +						     SC16IS7XX_MAX_DEVS);
>  		if (s->p[i].port.line >= SC16IS7XX_MAX_DEVS) {
>  			ret = -ERANGE;
>  			goto out_ports;
> @@ -1584,7 +1587,7 @@ int sc16is7xx_probe(struct device *dev, const struct sc16is7xx_devtype *devtype,
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto out_ports;
>  
> -		set_bit(s->p[i].port.line, sc16is7xx_lines);
> +		port_registered[i] = true;
>  
>  		/* Enable EFR */
>  		sc16is7xx_port_write(&s->p[i].port, SC16IS7XX_LCR_REG,
> @@ -1642,9 +1645,11 @@ int sc16is7xx_probe(struct device *dev, const struct sc16is7xx_devtype *devtype,
>  #endif
>  
>  out_ports:
> -	for (i = 0; i < devtype->nr_uart; i++)
> -		if (test_and_clear_bit(s->p[i].port.line, sc16is7xx_lines))
> +	for (i = 0; i < devtype->nr_uart; i++) {
> +		clear_bit(s->p[i].port.line, sc16is7xx_lines);
> +		if (port_registered[i])
>  			uart_remove_one_port(&sc16is7xx_uart, &s->p[i].port);
> +	}
>  
>  	kthread_stop(s->kworker_task);
>  
> @@ -1667,8 +1672,8 @@ void sc16is7xx_remove(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < s->devtype->nr_uart; i++) {
>  		kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync(&s->p[i].ms_work);
> -		if (test_and_clear_bit(s->p[i].port.line, sc16is7xx_lines))
> -			uart_remove_one_port(&sc16is7xx_uart, &s->p[i].port);
> +		clear_bit(s->p[i].port.line, sc16is7xx_lines);
> +		uart_remove_one_port(&sc16is7xx_uart, &s->p[i].port);
>  		sc16is7xx_power(&s->p[i].port, 0);
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
>