[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240209195704.GEZcaDkMUR560qafaI@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 20:57:04 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...el.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] x86/bugs: Add asm helpers for executing VERW
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 11:06:02AM -0800, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> (Though, there was a comment on avoiding the macro alltogether, to which
> I replied that it complicates 32-bit.)
Hmm, so this seems to build the respective entry_{32,64}.S TUs fine:
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
index e81cabcb758f..7d1e5fe66495 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -313,12 +313,9 @@
*
* Note: Only the memory operand variant of VERW clears the CPU buffers.
*/
-.macro EXEC_VERW
- verw _ASM_RIP(mds_verw_sel)
-.endm
.macro CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
- ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(EXEC_VERW), X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
+ ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(verw _ASM_RIP(mds_verw_sel)), X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
.endm
#else /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
---
and looking at the asm:
64-bit:
# 317 "./arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h"
macro CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
ALTERNATIVE "", "verw mds_verw_sel (% rip)", ( 3*32+18)
endm
23: 0f 00 2d 00 00 00 00 verw 0x0(%rip) # 2a <.altinstr_replacement+0x2a>
32-bit:
macro CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
ALTERNATIVE "", "verw mds_verw_sel", ( 3*32+18)
endm
13d: 0f 00 2d 00 00 00 00 verw 0x0
it makes sense.
So what complications do you mean?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists