lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 20:41:05 +0000
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>, Claudiu.Beznea
	<claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org"
	<kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Claudiu Beznea
	<claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net: ravb: Do not apply RX checksum
 settings to hardware if the interface is down

Hi Sergey,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
> Sent: Friday, February 9, 2024 8:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net: ravb: Do not apply RX checksum
> settings to hardware if the interface is down
> 
> On 2/9/24 8:04 PM, Claudiu wrote:
> 
> > From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > Do not apply the RX checksum settings to hardware if the interface is
> down.
> > In case runtime PM is enabled, and while the interface is down, the IP
> > will be in reset mode (as for some platforms disabling the clocks will
> > switch the IP to reset mode, which will lead to losing register
> > contents) and applying settings in reset mode is not an option.
> > Instead, cache the RX checksum settings and apply them in ravb_open()
> through ravb_emac_init().
> > This has been solved by introducing pm_runtime_active() check. The
> > device runtime PM usage counter has been incremented to avoid
> > disabling the device clocks while the check is in progress (if any).
> >
> > Commit prepares for the addition of runtime PM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>

This will do the same job, without code duplication right?

static int ravb_set_features(struct net_device *ndev,
			     netdev_features_t features)
{
	struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
	struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev;
	const struct ravb_hw_info *info = priv->info;

	pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
	if (!pm_runtime_active(dev)) {
		pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
		ndev->features = features;
		return 0;
	}
		
	return info->set_feature(ndev, features);
}

Cheers,
Biju

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ