linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/compaction: add support for >0 order folio memory compaction.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E833B0D-668E-4CDD-9E7C-5D01185B3D12@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:47:32 -0500
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 "\"Huang, Ying\"" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 "\"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)\"" <willy@...radead.org>,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
 "\"Yin, Fengwei\"" <fengwei.yin@...el.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
 "\"Kirill A . Shutemov\"" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
 Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
 Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
 Rohan Puri <rohan.puri15@...il.com>, Mcgrof Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
 Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@...sung.com>,
 "\"Vishal Moola (Oracle)\"" <vishal.moola@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/compaction: add support for >0 order folio
 memory compaction.

On 9 Feb 2024, at 15:46, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

> On 2/9/24 20:40, Zi Yan wrote:
>> On 9 Feb 2024, at 14:36, Zi Yan wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 Feb 2024, at 11:37, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/2/24 17:15, Zi Yan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>>  /*
>>>>> @@ -1835,9 +1857,17 @@ static struct folio *compaction_alloc(struct folio *src, unsigned long data)
>>>>>  static void compaction_free(struct folio *dst, unsigned long data)
>>>>>  {
>>>>>  	struct compact_control *cc = (struct compact_control *)data;
>>>>> +	int order = folio_order(dst);
>>>>> +	struct page *page = &dst->page;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	folio_set_count(dst, 0);
>>>>
>>>> We can't change refcount to 0 like this, after it was already set to 1 and
>>>> somebody else might have done get_page_unless_zero(). You need to either
>>>> put_page_testzero() and if it's false, consider the page lost, or leave it
>>>> refcounted and adjust the code to handle both refcounted and non-refcounted
>>>> pages on the lists (the first option is simpler and shouldn't be too bad).
>>> Got it. Will fix it with the first option. Thanks.
>>
>> Do you think we should have a WARN or WARN_ONCE if we lose a page here?
>
> No, no WARN, it all happens legitimately. It's only our compaction losing
> the page - whoever would do the get_page_unless_zero() to inspect that page
> would then have to put_page() which will free it back to page allocator.

Got it. Thanks for the explanation.

--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (855 bytes)