| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4237a933-0f61-417f-bbb6-ce5954b304d4@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 05:53:25 +0800
From: Lijun Pan <lijun.pan@...el.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, "Dave
Jiang" <dave.jiang@...el.com>
CC: <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: idxd: Ensure safe user copy of completion
record
On 2/10/2024 3:14 AM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> If CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is enabled, copying completion record from
> event log cache to user triggers a kernel bug.
>
> [ 1987.159822] usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'dsa0' (offset 74, size 31)!
> [ 1987.170845] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 1987.176086] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102!
> [ 1987.180946] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> [ 1987.186866] CPU: 17 PID: 528 Comm: kworker/17:1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2+ #5
> [ 1987.194537] Hardware name: Intel Corporation AvenueCity/AvenueCity, BIOS BHSDCRB1.86B.2492.D03.2307181620 07/18/2023
> [ 1987.206405] Workqueue: wq0.0 idxd_evl_fault_work [idxd]
> [ 1987.212338] RIP: 0010:usercopy_abort+0x72/0x90
> [ 1987.217381] Code: 58 65 9c 50 48 c7 c2 17 85 61 9c 57 48 c7 c7 98 fd 6b 9c 48 0f 44 d6 48 c7 c6 b3 08 62 9c 4c 89 d1 49 0f 44 f3 e8 1e 2e d5 ff <0f> 0b 49 c7 c1 9e 42 61 9c 4c 89 cf 4d 89 c8 eb a9 66 66 2e 0f 1f
> [ 1987.238505] RSP: 0018:ff62f5cf20607d60 EFLAGS: 00010246
> [ 1987.244423] RAX: 000000000000005f RBX: 000000000000001f RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 1987.252480] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff9c61429e RDI: 00000000ffffffff
> [ 1987.260538] RBP: ff62f5cf20607d78 R08: ff2a6a89ef3fffe8 R09: 00000000fffeffff
> [ 1987.268595] R10: ff2a6a89eed00000 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ff2a66934849c89a
> [ 1987.276652] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ff2a66934849c8b9 R15: ff2a66934849c899
> [ 1987.284710] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff2a66b22fe40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 1987.293850] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 1987.300355] CR2: 00007fe291a37000 CR3: 000000010fbd4005 CR4: 0000000000f71ef0
> [ 1987.308413] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [ 1987.316470] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [ 1987.324527] PKRU: 55555554
> [ 1987.327622] Call Trace:
> [ 1987.330424] <TASK>
> [ 1987.332826] ? show_regs+0x6e/0x80
> [ 1987.336703] ? die+0x3c/0xa0
> [ 1987.339988] ? do_trap+0xd4/0xf0
> [ 1987.343662] ? do_error_trap+0x75/0xa0
> [ 1987.347922] ? usercopy_abort+0x72/0x90
> [ 1987.352277] ? exc_invalid_op+0x57/0x80
> [ 1987.356634] ? usercopy_abort+0x72/0x90
> [ 1987.360988] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30
> [ 1987.365734] ? usercopy_abort+0x72/0x90
> [ 1987.370088] __check_heap_object+0xb7/0xd0
> [ 1987.374739] __check_object_size+0x175/0x2d0
> [ 1987.379588] idxd_copy_cr+0xa9/0x130 [idxd]
> [ 1987.384341] idxd_evl_fault_work+0x127/0x390 [idxd]
> [ 1987.389878] process_one_work+0x13e/0x300
> [ 1987.394435] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> [ 1987.399284] worker_thread+0x2f7/0x420
> [ 1987.403544] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2b/0x50
> [ 1987.409171] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> [ 1987.414019] kthread+0x107/0x140
> [ 1987.417693] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 1987.421954] ret_from_fork+0x3d/0x60
> [ 1987.426019] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 1987.430281] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
> [ 1987.434744] </TASK>
>
> The issue arises because event log cache is created using
> kmem_cache_create() which is not suitable for user copy.
>
> Fix the issue by creating event log cache with
> kmem_cache_create_usercopy(), ensuring safe user copy.
s/, ensuring/ to ensure
>
> Fixes: c2f156bf168f ("dmaengine: idxd: create kmem cache for event log fault items")
> Reported-by: Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijun Pan <lijun.pan@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/idxd/init.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c b/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
> index 14df1f1347a8..4954adc6bb60 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
> @@ -343,7 +343,9 @@ static void idxd_cleanup_internals(struct idxd_device *idxd)
> static int idxd_init_evl(struct idxd_device *idxd)
> {
> struct device *dev = &idxd->pdev->dev;
> + unsigned int evl_cache_size;
> struct idxd_evl *evl;
> + const char *idxd_name;
>
> if (idxd->hw.gen_cap.evl_support == 0)
> return 0;
> @@ -355,9 +357,16 @@ static int idxd_init_evl(struct idxd_device *idxd)
> spin_lock_init(&evl->lock);
> evl->size = IDXD_EVL_SIZE_MIN;
>
> - idxd->evl_cache = kmem_cache_create(dev_name(idxd_confdev(idxd)),
> - sizeof(struct idxd_evl_fault) + evl_ent_size(idxd),
> - 0, 0, NULL);
> + idxd_name = dev_name(idxd_confdev(idxd));
> + evl_cache_size = sizeof(struct idxd_evl_fault) + evl_ent_size(idxd);
> + /*
> + * Since completion record in evl_cache will be copied to user
> + * when handling completion record page fault, need to create
> + * the cache suitable for user copy.
> + */
Maybe briefly compare kmem_cache_create() with
kmem_cache_create_usercopy() and add up to the above comments. If you
think it too verbose, then forget about it.
> + idxd->evl_cache = kmem_cache_create_usercopy(idxd_name, evl_cache_size,
> + 0, 0, 0, evl_cache_size,
> + NULL);
> if (!idxd->evl_cache) {
> kfree(evl);
> return -ENOMEM;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists