[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <170751693770.1169242.13110612989281667030.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:16:10 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] perf symbols: Slightly improve module file executable section mappings
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 10:53:24 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Currently perf does not record module section addresses except for
> the .text section. In general that means perf cannot get module section
> mappings correct (except for .text) when loading symbols from a kernel
> module file. (Note using --kcore does not have this issue)
>
> Here are a couple of patches to help shed light upon and slightly improve
> the situation.
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
--
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists