linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] perf symbols: Slightly improve module file executable section mappings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri,  9 Feb 2024 14:16:10 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] perf symbols: Slightly improve module file executable section mappings

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 10:53:24 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Currently perf does not record module section addresses except for
> the .text section. In general that means perf cannot get module section
> mappings correct (except for .text) when loading symbols from a kernel
> module file. (Note using --kcore does not have this issue)
> 
> Here are a couple of patches to help shed light upon and slightly improve
> the situation.
> 
> [...]

Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>