linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] dm-raid/md/raid: fix v6.7 regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPhsuW6VqSRUsB2oQ+Hmf-0+2gfKHgN1skvvUwDmqDOxJvEKtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:37:47 -0800
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@...hat.com>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, mpatocka@...hat.com, heinzm@...hat.com, 
	xni@...hat.com, blazej.kucman@...ux.intel.com, agk@...hat.com, 
	snitzer@...nel.org, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, jbrassow@....redhat.com, 
	neilb@...e.de, shli@...com, akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, 
	"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] dm-raid/md/raid: fix v6.7 regressions

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 3:17 PM Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@...hat.com> wrote:
>
[...]
> >
> > I am not able to get reliable results from shell/lvconvert-repair-raid.sh
> > either. For 6.6.0 kernel, the test fails. On 6.8-rc1 kernel, the test fails
> > sometimes.
> >
> > Could you please share more information about your test setup?
> > Specifically:
> > 1. Which tree/branch/tag are you testing?
> > 2. What's the .config used in the tests?
> > 3. How do you run the test suite? One test at a time, or all of them
> > together?
> > 4. How do you handle "test passes sometimes" cases?
>
> So, I have been able to recreate the case where lvconvert-repair-raid.sh
> keeps failing. It happens when I tried running the reproducer on a virtual
> machine made using a cloud image, instead of one that I manually
> installed. I'm not sure why there is a difference. But I can show you
> how I can reliably recreate the errors I'm seeing.
>
>
> Create a new Fedora 39 virtual machine with the following commands (I'm
> not sure if it is possible to reproduce this on a machine using less
> memory and cpus, but I can try that if you need me to. You probably also
> want to pick a faster Fedora Mirror for the image location):
> # virt-install --name repair-test --memory 8192 --vcpus 8 --disk size=40 --graphics none --extra-args "console=ttyS0" --osinfo detect=on,name=fedora-unknown --location https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/39/Server/x86_64/os/
>

virt-install doesn't work well in the my daily dev server. I will try on a
different machine.

> Install to the whole virtual drive, using the default LVM partitioning.
> Then ssh into the VM and run the following commands to setup the
> lvm2-testsuite and 6.6.0 kernel:
>
[...]

>
> Rerun the lvm2-testsuite with the same commands as before:
>
> # mount -o remount,dev /tmp

This mount trick helped me run tests without a full image (use
CONFIG_9P_FS to reuse host file systems instead). Thanks!

> # cd ~/lvm2
> # make check T=lvconvert-repair-raid.sh
>
> This fails about 20% of the time, usually at either line 146 or 164. You
> can check by running the following command when the test fails.

However, I am seeing lvconvert-repair-raid.sh passes all the time
with both 6.6 kernel and 6.8+v5 patchset. My host system is
CentOS 8.

I guess we will have to run more tests.

DM folks, please also review the set. We won't be able to ship the
dm changes without your thorough reviews.

Thanks,
Song