linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/19] x86/startup_64: Drop global variables keeping track of LA57 state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMj1kXF+mHCYs08q58QFGuzZ4nzGd2sDr1gp2ydkOHHQ2LK5tQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 13:55:02 +0000
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, 
	Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, 
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, 
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, 
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/19] x86/startup_64: Drop global variables keeping
 track of LA57 state

On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 13:29, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:05:09PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >  static inline bool pgtable_l5_enabled(void)
> >  {
> >       return __pgtable_l5_enabled;
> >  }
> >  #else
> > -#define pgtable_l5_enabled() cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_LA57)
> > +#define pgtable_l5_enabled() !!(native_read_cr4() & X86_CR4_LA57)
> >  #endif /* USE_EARLY_PGTABLE_L5 */
>
> Can we drop this ifdeffery and simply have __pgtable_l5_enabled always
> present and contain the correct value?
>

I was trying to get rid of global variable assignments and accesses
from the 1:1 mapping, but since we cannot get rid of those entirely,
we might just keep __pgtable_l5_enabled but use RIP_REL_REF() in the
accessors, and move the assignment to the asm startup code.

> So that we don't have an expensive CR4 read hidden in
> pgtable_l5_enabled()?
>

Yeah, I didn't realize it was expensive. Alternatively, we might do
something like

static __always_inline bool pgtable_l5_enabled(void)
{
   unsigned long r;
   bool ret;

   asm(ALTERNATIVE_TERNARY(
       "movq %%cr4, %[reg] \n\t btl %[la57], %k[reg]" CC_SET(c),
       %P[feat], "stc", "clc")
       : [reg] "=r" (r), CC_OUT(c) (ret)
       : [feat] "i" (X86_FEATURE_LA57),
         [la57] "i" (X86_CR4_LA57_BIT)
       : "cc");
   return ret;
}

but we'd still have two versions in that case.

> For the sake of simplicity, pgtable_l5_enabled() can be defined outside
> of CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL and since both vendors support 5level now, might as
> well start dropping the CONFIG ifdeffery slowly...
>
> Other than that - a nice cleanup!
>

Thanks.