linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: constify opaque pointer in gpio_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZcYxjSWahbSWQM6g@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:07:09 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: constify opaque pointer in gpio_device_find()
 match function

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 09:27:04PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The match function used in gpio_device_find() should not modify the
> contents of passed opaque pointer, because such modification would not
> be necessary for actual matching and it could lead to quite unreadable,
> spaghetti code.

IIRC I also asked Bart about this in his series where something similar
was used.

Good it's not only me who sees the benefits from this.
FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko