[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcVuWLKN8OHRQuRx@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 14:14:16 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2 wq/for-6.9] async: Use a dedicated unbound workqueue with
raised min_active
Async can schedule a number of interdependent work items. However, since
5797b1c18919 ("workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for
unbound workqueues"), unbound workqueues have separate min_active which sets
the number of interdependent work items that can be handled. This default
value is 8 which isn't sufficient for async and can lead to stalls during
resume from suspend in some cases.
Let's use a dedicated unbound workqueue with raised min_active.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/708a65cc-79ec-44a6-8454-a93d0f3114c3@samsung.com
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
---
Hello,
Marek, can you please see whether this solves the hang while resuming? If it
does and Rafael is okay with it, I'll route this patch through wq/for-6.9.
Thanks.
include/linux/async.h | 1 +
init/main.c | 1 +
kernel/async.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/include/linux/async.h
+++ b/include/linux/async.h
@@ -120,4 +120,5 @@ extern void async_synchronize_cookie(asy
extern void async_synchronize_cookie_domain(async_cookie_t cookie,
struct async_domain *domain);
extern bool current_is_async(void);
+extern void async_init(void);
#endif
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -1545,6 +1545,7 @@ static noinline void __init kernel_init_
sched_init_smp();
workqueue_init_topology();
+ async_init();
padata_init();
page_alloc_init_late();
--- a/kernel/async.c
+++ b/kernel/async.c
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static async_cookie_t next_cookie = 1;
static LIST_HEAD(async_global_pending); /* pending from all registered doms */
static ASYNC_DOMAIN(async_dfl_domain);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(async_lock);
+static struct workqueue_struct *async_wq;
struct async_entry {
struct list_head domain_list;
@@ -174,7 +175,7 @@ static async_cookie_t __async_schedule_n
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&async_lock, flags);
/* schedule for execution */
- queue_work_node(node, system_unbound_wq, &entry->work);
+ queue_work_node(node, async_wq, &entry->work);
return newcookie;
}
@@ -345,3 +346,17 @@ bool current_is_async(void)
return worker && worker->current_func == async_run_entry_fn;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(current_is_async);
+
+void __init async_init(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * Async can schedule a number of interdependent work items. However,
+ * unbound workqueues can handle only upto min_active interdependent
+ * work items. The default min_active of 8 isn't sufficient for async
+ * and can lead to stalls. Let's use a dedicated workqueue with raised
+ * min_active.
+ */
+ async_wq = alloc_workqueue("async", WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
+ BUG_ON(!async_wq);
+ workqueue_set_min_active(async_wq, WQ_DFL_ACTIVE);
+}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists