linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 03/13] dt-bindings: mfd: ti,tps6594: Add TI TPS65224 PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 17:11:46 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Bhargav Raviprakash <bhargav.r@...s.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, m.nirmaladevi@...s.com, lee@...nel.org,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, jpanis@...libre.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, nm@...com, vigneshr@...com,
	kristo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 03/13] dt-bindings: mfd: ti,tps6594: Add TI
 TPS65224 PMIC

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 04:23:33PM +0530, Bhargav Raviprakash wrote:
> TPS65224 is a Power Management IC with 4 Buck regulators and 3 LDO
> regulators, it includes additional features like GPIOs, watchdog, ESMs
> (Error Signal Monitor), and PFSM (Pre-configurable Finite State Machine)
> managing the state of the device.

> TPS6594 and TPS65224 have significant functional overlap.

What does "significant functional overlap" mean? Does one implement a
compatible subset of the other? I assume the answer is no, given there
seems to be some core looking registers at different addresses.

Thanks,
Conor.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)