[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcZj3/0xI6HqP8n8@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 17:41:51 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, robh@...nel.org,
andi.shyti@...nel.org, semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andre.draszik@...aro.org, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, willmcvicker@...gle.com,
conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] spi: dt-bindings: introduce the ``fifo-depth``
property
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 04:21:16PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 01:56:56PM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> > At least I don't
> > see how it would work, I guess it will use the minimum depth between the
> > two?
> I'm not really sure how it would work other than that in the general
> case, but some use case specific configuration could work, but I do
> agree that it is
You do get devices that are single duplex only where the mismatched
sizes wouldn't be a pressing issue.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists