[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcZ7wEUzESxUhs-y@agluck-desk3>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 11:23:44 -0800
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15-RFC 5/8] x86/resctrl: Add "NODE" as an option for
resource scope
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 09:29:03AM -0600, Moger, Babu wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> This patch probably needs to be merged with with patch 7.
If it just added RESCTRL_NODE to the enum and the switch() I'd
agree (as patch 7 is where RESCTRL_NODE first used). But this
patch also adds the sanity checks on scope where it has to be
a cache level.
Patch 7 is already on the big side (119 lines added to core.c).
If you really think this series needs to cut back the
number of patches, I could move the sanity check pieces
from here to patch 3 (where the enum is introduced) and
just the RESCTRL_NODE bits to patch 7.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists