[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240210113924.1130448-4-alexs@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:39:22 +0800
From: alexs@...nel.org
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list:SCHEDULER)
Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/5] sched/fair: Check the SD_ASYM_PACKING flag in sched_use_asym_prio()
From: Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>
sched_use_asym_prio() checks whether CPU priorities should be used. It
makes sense to check for the SD_ASYM_PACKING() inside the function.
Since both sched_asym() and sched_group_asym() use sched_use_asym_prio(),
remove the now superfluous checks for the flag in various places.
Tested-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 426eda9eda57..cd1ec57c0b7b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9740,6 +9740,9 @@ group_type group_classify(unsigned int imbalance_pct,
*/
static bool sched_use_asym_prio(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
{
+ if (!(sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING))
+ return false;
+
if (!sched_smt_active())
return true;
@@ -9933,11 +9936,9 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight;
/* Check if dst CPU is idle and preferred to this group */
- if (!local_group && env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING &&
- env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE && sgs->sum_h_nr_running &&
- sched_group_asym(env, sgs, group)) {
+ if (!local_group && env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE && sgs->sum_h_nr_running &&
+ sched_group_asym(env, sgs, group))
sgs->group_asym_packing = 1;
- }
/* Check for loaded SMT group to be balanced to dst CPU */
if (!local_group && smt_balance(env, sgs, group))
@@ -11033,9 +11034,7 @@ static struct rq *find_busiest_queue(struct lb_env *env,
* If balancing between cores, let lower priority CPUs help
* SMT cores with more than one busy sibling.
*/
- if ((env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING) &&
- sched_asym(env->sd, i, env->dst_cpu) &&
- nr_running == 1)
+ if (sched_asym(env->sd, i, env->dst_cpu) && nr_running == 1)
continue;
switch (env->migration_type) {
@@ -11131,8 +11130,7 @@ asym_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
* the lower priority @env::dst_cpu help it. Do not follow
* CPU priority.
*/
- return env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE && (env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING) &&
- sched_use_asym_prio(env->sd, env->dst_cpu) &&
+ return env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE && sched_use_asym_prio(env->sd, env->dst_cpu) &&
(sched_asym_prefer(env->dst_cpu, env->src_cpu) ||
!sched_use_asym_prio(env->sd, env->src_cpu));
}
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists