[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQb=n1dWdEAJy_aJWnkW2M3bR768WKpxnUv=CtBEi28Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 08:41:30 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@...le.fr>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] printk: Fix LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT when BASE_SMALL
is enabled
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 2:10 AM Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@...le.fr> wrote:
>
> LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT default value depends on BASE_SMALL:
> config LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT
> default 12 if !BASE_SMALL
> default 0 if BASE_SMALL
> But, BASE_SMALL is a config of type int and "!BASE_SMALL" is always
> evaluated to true whatever is the value of BASE_SMALL.
>
> This patch fixes this by using the correct conditional operator for int
> type : BASE_SMALL != 0.
>
> Note: This changes CONFIG_LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT=12 to
> CONFIG_LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT=0 for BASE_SMALL defconfigs, but that will
> not be a big impact due to this code in kernel/printk/printk.c:
> /* by default this will only continue through for large > 64 CPUs */
> if (cpu_extra <= __LOG_BUF_LEN / 2)
> return;
> Systems using CONFIG_BASE_SMALL and having 64+ CPUs should be quite
> rare.
>
> John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de> (printk reviewer) wrote:
> > For printk this will mean that BASE_SMALL systems were probably
> > previously allocating/using the dynamic ringbuffer and now they will
> > just continue to use the static ringbuffer. Which is fine and saves
> > memory (as it should).
>
> Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> (printk maintainer) wrote:
> > More precisely, it allocated the buffer dynamically when the sum
> > of per-CPU-extra space exceeded half of the default static ring
> > buffer. This happened for systems with more than 64 CPUs with
> > the default config values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@...le.fr>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdWm6u1wX7efZQf=2XUAHascps76YQac6rdnQGhc8nop_Q@mail.gmail.com/
> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/f6856be8-54b7-0fa0-1d17-39632bf29ada@oracle.com/
> Fixes: 4e244c10eab3 ("kconfig: remove unneeded symbol_empty variable")
>
All the Reviewed-by tags are dropped every time, annoyingly.
This is equivalent to v4, which had these tags:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> ---
> v3->v4:
> * Fix BASE_SMALL usage instead of switching to BASE_FULL because
> BASE_FULL will be removed in the next patches of this series.
> ---
> init/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index deda3d14135bb..d50ebd2a2ce42 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -734,8 +734,8 @@ config LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT
> int "CPU kernel log buffer size contribution (13 => 8 KB, 17 => 128KB)"
> depends on SMP
> range 0 21
> - default 12 if !BASE_SMALL
> - default 0 if BASE_SMALL
> + default 0 if BASE_SMALL != 0
> + default 12
> depends on PRINTK
> help
> This option allows to increase the default ring buffer size
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists